AI.news
主页教程研究工具模型AI创业讨论新闻每日简报WIKI🚀 创业库★ 投稿
AI+医疗机器人教育金融能源健康娱乐思考

Would Claude Fable's shadownerfing making an anticompetitive class action case

Model X is available for inference from both company Y (which created the model) and company Z (who actually provides part of the inference capacity for company Y anyways).

Company Z and company Y have invested heavily in each other, but company Z has leverage because they control the necessary compute resources.

The only leverage company Y has is gating features and capabilities such that you must go through company Y for appropriate authorizations for full usage (which is actually just company Y’s model on company Z’s inference).

Class action? No idea.

Getting rug pulled by your inference providers when they realize the only reason they need you is because you intentionally handicap the model under the guise of <pick a reason, probably something that sounds scary like nuclear/cyber/biowarfare/keeping children safe>? Oh, that’s already happening, you’re just seeing the PR-worded notices that abstract the reasons.