AI.news
主页教程研究工具模型AI创业讨论新闻每日简报WIKI🚀 创业库★ 投稿
AI+医疗机器人教育金融能源健康娱乐思考

When Should an AI Scientist Stop? Verifiable Experiment Steering and Refusal for Autonomous Discovery

arxiv.org
分享

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We present CARTOGRAPH, a verification layer for AI scientists that couples unresolved-subspace experiment steering (select), explicit ambiguity closure (resolve), and residual-based library inadequacy detection (refuse). Under a local linear-Gaussian bridge, raw unresolved projection is the isotropic unresolved Fisher-information trace, while CARTOGRAPH-A is the exact unresolved A-optimal rule; closed-form EIG and Box-Hill arise as local comparators rather than global equivalents. Across five testbeds, CARTOGRAPH-A beats raw projection 129W/0T/15L at d = 8 (p < 10^-21) in a replicated structured cascade. More distinctively, the framework tentatively identifies three out-of-library pharmacokinetic mechanisms and then revokes those identifications as residuals expose structural misfit, while one perturbed in-library control stays identified throughout. In low-dimensional pharmacokinetic and filtered EPA settings, near-ties against disagreement are predicted by theory and observed. Finally, in a retrospective audit of 40 positive claims from the published A-Lab autonomous materials system, the refuse guard flags all 4 claims later marked inconclusive under manual reanalysis while passing 32/36 confirmed claims. Code is available at this https URL

Submission history

From: Neel Tushar Shah [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 May 2026 18:19:16 UTC (2,066 KB)